THE CONCRETE BRIDGE MAGAZINE

SUMMER 2011

ASPIRE is a quarterly magazine published by PCI in cooperation with the associations of the National Concrete Bridge Council. The editorial content focuses on the latest technology and key issues in the Concrete Bridge Industry.

Issue link: http://www.aspiremagazinebyengineers.com/i/306186

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 31 of 63

C R E AT I V E C O N C R E T E C O N S T R U C T I O N 30 | ASPIRE , Summer 2011 I n precast concrete segmental balanced cantilever construction, the pier segment is most often produced in a casting yard and erected on bearings and falsework. Alternatively, cast-in-place concrete pier segments have been utilized for longer spans or in areas of high seismicity where a monolithic connection to the column provides a more economical substructure design. Precast concrete pier shells with cast-in-place diaphragms can be proposed as a substitute for cast-in-place pier segments. Pier shells are a hybrid of fully precast and cast-in- place construction, and combine their typical advantages and disadvantages. Advantages • A monolithic connection is provided between the superstructure and column for incorporating seismic design details. The integral pier column connection also provides overturning stability for the partially erected cantilever. • Typical segment forms can be used to produce the shell segments in the casting yard. These shells are similar in weight to typical segments. • The cantilever is a single match-cast unit, so no closure pour is required between the pier segment and first typical segments. disadvantages • Reinforcing details are complex and have small tolerances. Coupled and headed reinforcement is utilized to reduce congestion in the diaphragm. • Diaphragm concrete and reinforcement are placed in difficult conditions at the top of a column. • The erection speed falls between that of fully precast piers and cast-in-place concrete construction. Erection sequence With precast pier shells, the fabrication and erection sequence is as follows: • The pier shell is fabricated in the casting yard using either a unique form or the typical segment form with minor modifications. • The shell is erected on the column and supported temporarily using falsework. It is positioned for line and grade, and locked into position. • The diaphragm reinforcing cage is placed in the pier shell. The forms for the diaphragm are secured and the diaphragm cast. Conclusion Pier shells can provide advantages over other methods for precast concrete balanced cantilever bridges, particularly in seismically active areas where an integral pier column connection is required for design. _______ Zach Godsell is senior bridge engineer with McNary Bergeron & Associates in Denver, Colo. Pier shells were used in two projects featured in this issue. See The Miami Intermodal Center—Earlington Heights Connector on page 26 and The Westbound Nalley Valley Interchange on page 22. Precast Concrete Pier Shells in Segmental Bridge Design by Zach Godsell, McNary Bergeron & Associates Construction of Ramp SW over I-5 in Tacoma, Wash. Photos: Guy F. Atkinson Construction." Shell segment erection. Diaphragm cage and column reinforcement. Completed diaphragm and monolithic pier connection. Diaphragm cage installation for the LBJ "High Five" in Dallas, Tex. Photo: McNary Bergeron & Associates. Pier shell segment cast for the MIC-Earlington Heights Connector in Miami, Fla. Photo: McNary Bergeron & Associates. Editor's NotE Book_Sum11.indb 30 7/1/11 9:59 AM

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of THE CONCRETE BRIDGE MAGAZINE - SUMMER 2011